It sounded like amazingly good news, but I couldn't quite understand it, since although there's been a small improvement over the last 6 months, it's what's described as "stable disease" (ie less than 25% change). For that reason I didn't fully let myself believe it, nor did I go into detail on the blog, waiting till I got more information before I broadcast it. (However, I did feel anxious about possibly losing the reassuring structure and support of the clinic, and worried that I wasn't appropriately thrilled, and I agonised about whether I was repressing my emotions, or deep down didn't really want to be better - you'd be surprised how much self-flagellation supposedly good news can bring!) However, I then got the reports from the Marsden radiologist, and those also stated "stable disease". So I rang the nurse specialist to find out why, in that case, the team had concluded that I shouldn't have any more treatment, and it turned out that - far from thinking that there's nothing left to treat - doing any more than 3 chemoebolisations hasn't been definitively proved to be of benefit, so they don't think there's any point in me having more treatment. Rather a difference!
Of course I discussed it with both Dr Herzog and Professor Vogl when I got here, and they both disagreed with the Marsden's view, saying that cells can appear dormant at a given timepoint, but it's dangerous to jump to the conclusion that they're dead or harmless. Dr Herzog had no doubt that if we stopped treating, the cancer would spread, and become harder to treat - he makes decisions on how cancer cells behave over time, not how they look on a scan. That makes sense to me, and although it's a more cautious interpretation of the scan, I much prefer that to the "Russian roulette" approach of stopping treatment just to see how whether / how quickly it grows back. I also trusted Dr Herzog's opinion because he's seen me regularly and has thought (and discussed with me) a lot about how the treatment's going, whereas there's no-one at the Marsden who's really got to know me so their conclusions are all based on technical data, and it doesn't really inspire confidence that they're looking at the whole picture (especially as they've also made a couple of fairly basic mistakes in previous reports, such as the date of my diagnosis and how many treatments I've had). So I'm following Dr Herzog's advice and we're continuing with the chemoembolisations - though we're leaving a 6-week gap this time to see if it remains stable, and if it does, gradually increase the time interval if we can.
So all's still as before, nothing's changed, and in this game that's a very good result. But as you can imagine, I've been pretty gutted, having had that hope dangled in front of me that maybe it was going better than that. I was fairly angry with the Marsden at first, for recommending me to stop a treatment that's working when they've got nothing to offer me themselves, and I felt very mucked around emotionally. But I don't think they've done anything unprofessional - I used to think that scans are like photographs, a clear picture which you can accurately measure and quantify, but although some may be like that, mine definitely aren't, so it's all about the subjective (and highly skilled) art of interpretation. And the Marsden are guided by the research evidence from gold standard trials, so naturally their view will differ from doctors working pragmatically and experimentally and relying on their clinical judgement and intuition. Still, even though I didn't really fully believe it, of course I hoped, and it's pretty devastating to come back from that.
But come back from it I must, and I'm trying hard to look on the bright side - I'm so lucky to have a treatment which holds it stable, and although of course I want it miraculously cured, I also know that once cancer's metastasised it's all about stopping it progressing, rather than expecting to cure it. I'm extremely lucky that - for now - it's stable at a point where my day-to-day health and lifestyle isn't significantly limited by it. So that's what I'm aiming to feel grateful for: although I haven't let go of the hope for a miracle, I don't want it to mean I miss out on appreciating what's good about how things actually are right now. Plus, whatever scans look like, no-one can predict exactly what'll happen in the future, so although it's hard living with the uncertainty, it's something I just have to learn to adapt to. It's been good being around other patients, who understand that challenge only too well, and I've really appreciated the support and understanding I've had from those I've confided in.
As I said, I had mixed feelings about writing such personal things so publicly, but I know that I have a tendency to present myself as sorted and positive, so I wanted to be honest about what it's like emotionally and what I've been struggling with. It's hard to know what kind of detail to go into on this blog - as there aren't many comments I don't really know what people think when they read it (or exactly who's reading it), so I hope it doesn't feel like an inappropriate "splurge".
I'll do another post about the rest of the visit in a few days' time. Till then, some photos to finish off with (don't be fooled by the lack of snow, it hasn't risen above minus 7 since I got here!)
Frosty sunrise |
Sunrise over the village |
Winter sun |
Just to let you know that I've read your post and am thinking of you. The more I learn about medicine and diagnosis the more I think it is an art as much as a science. I hope the treatment continues to work for you and that you can prove the Marsden wrong! You have to go with what feels right for you.
ReplyDeleteIt is still freezing in London but not as cold as Germany!!
love Caroline
Just a note to say I'm reading :) I think about you a lot, and its great to know I can go here to see how things are going for you. Hope to catch up with you soon. Lots of love, Meraud xx
ReplyDeleteIn answer to your question, what do people think when they read your blog, speaking for myself I think what an incredibly brave, candid, intelligent, honest and fabulous person you are and how lucky we are to know you. And how well you express yourself, compared to my comments. And what lovely pictures you take. Does that help ?
ReplyDeleteXXX
Wow... Yes - it does help, enormously. Thank you all so much - it means a huge amount to hear your lovely words - it's so reassuring and makes me feel cared about and not alone. A heartfelt thank you x
ReplyDeleteAwwww Sylvia I'm so sorry I can onyl imagine how distressing that must have been for you. I am in awe of how you go about your daily life with such dignity. You really are amazing! And I agree with everything Anonymous above wrote too! I love the blog and I am grateful for it so thank you and please keep writing :)
ReplyDeleteSareyeh X
"I don't really know what people think when they read it (or exactly who's reading it), so I hope it doesn't feel like an inappropriate 'splurge'".
ReplyDeleteMy comment here is a bit late, but just to let you know that I read the blog when I can (admittedly not as often as I ideally would) and personally I find it anything but an inappropriate splurge at all. Indeed, I find it very candid and honest, and am sure I could never do something like this so well (in all senses). The main thing too is whether you find it useful - it seems and I hope that you do, and hopefully by knowing we're reading it, that helps too.
All the best, Mark
Sylvia, I'm reading (though often in lumps of several posts at a time) and appreciating this blog very much. You're so clear when you write about your emotions and the impact of different experiences (your ski holiday, your various stays in Germany, the joys of being involved in a huge specialist medical service like the Marsden). I'm impressed by your approach (though not surprised) and by your writing too!
ReplyDeleteThanks.
Ps I've added you to google reader my rss feed now so hopefully will catch up with your posts much more quickly! X
ReplyDelete